Right, on with the custard...
Apparently they really liked applesauce at my great-grandmother's house. She pasted in a lot of recipes that use it. (Or maybe she really liked applesauce and everyone else had no choice.)
| Applesauce Custard 1 egg 1 cup applesauce 1 cup milk ½ tsp melted butter, melted Sugar to taste ½ cup raisins Heat oven to 350°. Grease a small baking dish (one that holds 4 cups or so). In a medium mixing bowl, whisk the egg until well-beaten. Stir in the applesauce, milk, and butter. Add sugar to taste, and mix well. Lastly, add the raisins. Pour into the pan. Spread the raisins out with a spoon if they landed in a pile in the center. Bake until it jiggles but does not slosh, which may take longer than you think.
Newspaper clipping, Chicago area, probably 1930s-1940s
|
I really like making complicated and fussy recipes when my mood is right. But today, I wanted to be nearly done after dumping the ingredients into a bowl.
We only needed one more ingredient to complete the custard, one that is sure to draw complaints at the dinner table: raisins! If I were to speculate, the raisins are here to to add little concentrated pods of sugar to the recipe without adding more sugar to the grocery bill. Or perhaps they are meant to add textural interest to what is otherwise more or less a small pan of baked applesauce. Either way, the raisins promptly sank when I mixed them in.
Oh, and we almost forgot something! I don't know what this tiny little splat of butter is supposed to do, but let the record show that I remembered to add it.
I thought for a moment that I was supposed to put this on the stovetop for a while before baking it. However, our instructions simply say to "bake until custard is firm." Even in a newspaper recipe written as tersely as possible, I figure they would have at least briefly mentioned a saucepan if I was supposed to use one. And so, I poured this into a small baking dish and hoped for the best.
I should note that in order to fend off questions about what was in the oven (and the inevitable disappointment when I answered), I made a batch of decoy cookies. For one thing, we had a partial carton of cream that was pushing its expiration date, and the cookie recipe conveniently used the last of it. But more importantly, I could wave cookies at people and prevent anyone asking what was in the small pan next to them.
The custard took a really long time to bake. Every time I pulled a batch of cookies out of the oven, I gave the rack a shake to see how things were going in the pan. It simply refused to set. I started to wonder if this recipe used too much liquid for our one egg to set. When the custard showed the first signs of a pretty golden top, I began to think this was coming out all right. But then it started boiling hard. I feared that I had basically made egg drop soup with applesauce in it. Also, exactly one raisin had floated to the surface.
After leaving this in the fridge overnight, the custard looked like a worn-out sponge.
This wasn't necessarily bad, but it tastes like economizing. It was an underwhelming dessert, but a surprisingly decent side dish with the pot roast. But I can't get past the texture on this-- and I'm not usually finicky about texture. You know how applesauce is full of tiny little apple chunks? Well, they made this seem curdled regardless of whether it actually was. I think it would be a lot better with thoroughly pureed apples. (Was applesauce more thoroughly pulverized in those days?) I don't regret making this, but I'm not in a rush to repeat it.







I suspect that apple sauce was the best way to preserve apples back then. I've heard that apples are stored in low oxygen environments now, which is why they're so bland and mealy by spring.
ReplyDeleteI also suspect that these overly gloppy custards were put in the oven so they didn't have to be watched and stirred. I feel like these long baking items represent a time when utilities were way cheaper than they are now.
It probably was.
DeleteYou know, I didn't think about that. And I wouldn't be surprised if the oven was used a lot more throughout the year in the absence of microwaves, so putting a small custard pan in the back corner wasn't a big deal- even in the summer time.
You have been BUSY! I spend a couple weeks holed up grading (and posting links to information about local food banks, soup kitchens, etc. because I don't want my students or their families to go hungry), and you've got dozen new recipes up. And some helpful information about making sure nobody goes hungry. You definitely deserved a better outcome than that custard. At least it has the amusing raisin belly button.
ReplyDeleteYeah, lately I've found it very calming to just sit and turn all my notes into actual sentences. And yeah, I didn't used to know that food banks actually buy food instead of subsist entirely on can drives. So if anyone dropping by didn't know that either, now they do. It's my small contribution.
DeleteAnd yeah, cutting SNAP infuriates me more than everything else. I'm not into deprogramming and don't have the tact required, but I did get a few of my more conservative relatives to agree that taking food from the hungry is bad. So... baby steps?
I'm not sure how to address domestic food insecurity. I did once make someone rethink their stance against foreign food aid. I think of it as an anti terrorist policy. If you and your kids and your grandkids are starving to death and a terrorist group offers to take care of your family so they won't starve to death are you going to do it? Even if you don't agree with what they stand for? It's the only viable way to feed your family.
DeleteNow imagine having cooking oil, beans and rice from an aid program so you're still hungry, but not starving. Would you take that mission you might not come back from?
I just don't understand the vitriol for people who go hungry. Even if they were just scamming the rest of us because they're too lazy to work (which I absolutely do not believe to be the case anyway), I couldn't get that worked up about it. Nobody asked to be here. We are just here and doing our best. Just because somebody else's "best" seems unacceptable to you, so what? You're not living their life. You don't know what they have to deal with. If you exist through no fault of your own (a condition that covers everyone!), you should at least be entitled to the basic necessities.
DeleteHonestly, I think conservatism is the just-world fallacy with God on top. (Or at least, with supply-side Jesus on top.) Therefore, if someone is on welfare, it is their fault for choosing to be a lesser human-- or something like that. And of course, when they miss a paycheck and end up at the food pantry, their case is different than all those lazy entitled poor people.
DeleteOn a related note, the antimasking anger made me finally lose faith in conservatives. If they get angry over putting a little bit of paper over their faces....
But liberals are the snowflakes! (I think I just sprained my eyes from rolling them so hard.)
Delete