Sunday, February 5, 2023

New England Raisin Drops: or, Raisin-rationing for visual flair

They baited me with the words "New England" in the recipe name.

Philadelphia Inquirer Recipe Exchange, June 21 1935, page 12

New England Raisin Drops
1 cup sugar
¼ cup shortening
¼ cup butter
1 tsp baking soda
½ tsp salt
1 tsp baking powder
1 egg, well-beaten
1 cup thick sour milk, or buttermilk*
3 cups flour
Raisins
Cinnamon-sugar for sprinkling

Heat oven to 375°. Grease a cookie sheet. Cream the sugar, butter, shortening, baking soda, baking powder, and salt.
Add the egg, beat well. Then mix in the flour.
Drop by the teaspoon onto baking sheets. This dough doesn't spread. It keeps its shape as you put it onto the pan. So if you prefer more neatly-shaped cookies, roll them into small balls before baking.
Place three raisins onto each cookie, and press them into place. Then sprinkle the cookies with cinnamon sugar.
Bake 10-12 minutes, or until golden on the bottom. (You can also tell they're done when the raisins puff up like balloons.)

*You can also use sour cream.

Bertha Lyman Shellington, 3 West Park Avenue, Haddonfield, NJ; Philadelphia Inquirer Recipe Exchange, June 21 1935, page 12

These could have been named Raisin Drops. But Bertha Lyman Shellington called them New England Raisin Drops. With those two added words, these cookies became a tiny piece of that part of the country where they have beautiful colors in the autumn, quaint houses from the 1600s, and crowds of summer tourists making pilgrimages to the places named in the first chapter of their American History textbooks. 

Bertha Lyman Shellington tells us to use "shortening and butter, mixed" in the ingredients list. I've heard people say you get the best results in baking if you use both of them. Apparently, you get the flavor of the butter, but the shortening prevents the cookies from going too runny in the oven. However, I distrust shortening, with its unnatural whiteness and unnerving flavorlessness. Even cooking oil at least tastes like something. But we are going to follow the directions in the recipe, and blame the Philadelphia Inquirer if these are bad.

The creamed-together mixture was an odd color. It wasn't yellow enough to look right, but it wasn't white enough to look scientifically, artificially pure- the way anything made with shortening apparently should. 

At least the egg managed to make this a more normal-looking color.

The recipe tells us to use "thick, sour milk." Naturally, I used sour cream. The resulting mixture looked like cake batter and tasted oddly like a cheap cheesecake. By the way, that's not a bad thing.

After we had the cookie dough loaded with flour and ready to bake, it still tasted cheesecake-adjacent. It also tasted like it really wanted vanilla. 

The recipe next directs us to drop the cookies and bedeck them with the title ingredient: raisins.

Raisins bring out the weirdest things in people. Some people sanctimoniously give them out on Halloween, convinced that they are the vanguards in the crusade against candy.  Others passionately hate raisins every time they appear in otherwise good food. And if you're Bertha Shellington Lyman, you ration your raisins with mathematical precision. We are told to place exactly three raisins on each cookie. Three shalt be the number of raisins we shalt count, and the number of the raisins shall be three. Four shalt we not count, neither count we two, excepting that we then proceed to three. Five is right out.

I don't understand why we're supposed to be so rigorous with the raisins. If we were shaping the cookies into cute little crescents or using a cookie cutter, I can see how we might be more concerned with cookie aesthetics. But these are bumpy, charmingly-homemade drop cookies. I'd have stirred the raisins into the dough instead.

After I followed the written directions and did my best to achieve visually harmonious raisin placement, I thought the cookies would spread and come out of the oven looking like, you know, cookies. Instead, they ended up looking like the same dough lumps I had dropped on the pan a few minutes earlier. The raisins barely clung to the cookies, and fell off as soon as you touched one.

Did you ever see a sorrier sight?

The raisins tasted burnt and the cookies were too hard. I partially blame myself for this because I turned the oven too high. However, I only did that because Bertha Lyman Shellington specifically said to "bake in a hot oven." I reduced the temperature to a more moderate setting for successive batches, and also shaped the cookies into little balls instead of dropping them from a spoon. They came out looking like cute raisin poufs instead of like cookie clumps with raisin blisters.

Incidentally, I love how any cookies with raisins tell you when they're done. Without fail, the cookies are perfectly baked when the raisins puff up like brown balloons. (Don't worry, they deflate as soon as you remove them from the oven.)

These cookies are decent enough cake drops, but Mrs. George O. Thurn did them better. They had a nice texture: soft, fluffy, and ever-so-slightly dense. But they tasted like nothing. Would it have killed Bertha Lyman Shellington to add some damn vanilla? Weirdly, you could barely taste the raisins at all. Were they merely for presentation?

When you plucked the raisins off the cookies, they looked so much prettier. I haven't seen a recipe that was so much improved by removing the title ingredient since we made the pepper cake without pepper. If I make these cookies again, I might actually put five raisins on each of them so they look like little sand dollars after I remove them. I would also add some sort of flavoring.

The cookies were fine, if a bit underwhelming. Maybe the New England Raisin Drops were victims of my own anticipation. I was excited for a beraisined taste of New England, and you can't expect a cookie to conjure up an iced coffee on a cold evening in a park surrounded by rowhouses when the trees have turned red, yellow, and bright orange. But if we make these again, I'm definitely adding some sort of flavoring to them.

8 comments:

  1. Now you've got me wanting to watch "Monty Python and the Holy Grail"! And just so you know, many years ago when I took a quiz to find out which character I would be in that movie, I discovered that I am the Black Beast of Argh. Watch out!

    The raisin counting thing does seem really odd-- a lot of work that will possibly make your cooking a bit worse than if you'd done it the easy way. At least raisins inside the cookies won't burn (unless you burn the entire cookie).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have no idea (or really, you probably do) how many times I rewatched the Holy Hand Grenade scene long after I had typed up that one sentence and made sure it was right.
      Yeah, I'm not sure what was going on with her raisins either. It's not like they were particularly ornamental after getting baked and hardened.

      Delete
  2. Having grown up in a house from the 1800s, I immediately felt a twitch when you mentioned quaint houses from the 1600s. I live in a newer part of the country now, but there's an historic settlement nearby with buildings contemporary to what I grew up around. A friend tried to convince me to buy a house out there. That suggestion was not taken, and I'm quite happy to be living in a home that is younger than me.
    As for the cookies, I know that America's Test Kitchen once did a segment talking about the ratio of saturated vs unsaturated fats in baking to achieve different textures. Maybe that is why the shortening and butter were mixed. Or maybe she was just short of butter the day she originally made these. Since you know how many cookies it makes now, you could multiply that by 3, and count that exact number of raisins into the batter and stir them in. Raisins on top sounds gross because they will puff up, deflate, get hard and taste burned. I like your idea of using raisins for shaping only.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Funny how we always want what we don't have. I have long wanted to move into a house that still had live gas pipes for lights in the walls- partially because I got tired of candles every time the power blips (which is too frequent) and partially because I love this hanging wheel of fire that's in a historic courthouse in Wales: https://www.peoplescollection.wales/sites/default/files/images/2014/February/GTJ63107_2.jpg?itok=Me94GHCD
      You know, I didn't think about her maybe adapting the ingredients to what she had run out of. And maybe after adapting the recipe because she was short of butter, liked the results enough to make the recipe change permanent. And yeah, the raisins did exactly what you said: puffed, hardened, and burned.

      Delete
    2. That is a cool wheel of fire. You would have to have really high ceilings to accommodate that. I wonder what the maximum safe flame length is. If gas pressure unexpectedly increased, would it burn the place down? It seems like only a matter of time until our utilities revert to the past due to lack of capacity, maintenance, and upgrades.

      Delete
    3. The museum's website says the flames are six inches long. That thing hangs in a courtroom. Can you imagine being on trial with that wheel of flames burning over your head?
      You're not kidding about the lack of capacity and upgrades. Everyone here in Texas glances nervously at the lights whenever the temperature dips below freezing. As for myself, I'm wishing we had a house with a basement and an octopus furnace. That way if the power went out, we could still have heat. At least we have a gas water heater.

      Delete
  3. Perhaps these originated in a time and place where raisins were very expensive. So this is like putting all the gold leaf on the outside of the cake rather than, you know, mixing it in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe. After all, why cook with raisins when you can flaunt them instead?

      Delete